Re: Build failing on Solaris 9

• Previous message: (no name): "Re: Build failing on Solaris 9"
• Maybe in reply to: (no name): "Build failing on Solaris 9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:56:16AM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
>>
>> cd plugins; make digestmd5.lo CFLAGS=-E
>
> Thanks, that saved me an awful lot of near-miss thrashing. Sorry I
> didn't already know.
>
> ...
>
> I'm not sure what to make of my results.
>
> If I try to make digestmd5.lo immediately after the configure phase, I
> get a missing file error, though unlike the one I was getting before.
>
> Supposing that this isn't so surprising, next I tried to build the whole
> package, watched it fail with the same error I've been getting, and then
> re-tried the command above. This time the -E command completes
> successfully, and I do get a digestmd5.lo.
>
> Here's where we crash once more on the rocks of my ignorance... I looked
> through that file, found lots of references to include directories with
> header files in them, but no occurance of the string "des". I'm
> probably looking for the wrong thing. Little (more) help?
>
> Meanwhile Igor's message showed up, and I looked through config.h.
>
> $ egrep '(HAVE_DES_H|WITH_DES|WITH_SSL_DES)' config.h
> /* #undef HAVE_DES_H */
> #define WITH_DES
> /* #undef WITH_SSL_DES */

Configure did not find openssl.

Check config.log for clues.

-Igor

>
> I'm not sure if that's right or not, but I tried adding
> --with-ssl=/opt/pkgs/openssl to my ./configure line, and that didn't
> make any difference. Same #define, same commented-out #undef's. That's
> what I would expect, since from various lines of compiler output it does
> seem that the build process looks under canonical directories in /opt,
> and my openssl is symlinked into those directories.
>
> For the sake of comparison, next I tried putting "--without-des" back
> into my ./configure line. That did make a difference,
>
> /* #undef HAVE_DES_H */
> /* #undef WITH_DES */
> /* #undef WITH_SSL_DES */
>
> ...for whatever it's worth.
>
> So, what should I be expecting if everything is working correctly?
>
>

-- 
Igor

• Previous message: (no name): "Re: Build failing on Solaris 9"
• Maybe in reply to: (no name): "Build failing on Solaris 9"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]