From: Matt Sullivan (no email)
Date: Wed Jul 24 2002 - 21:16:02 EDT
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> Why use mpool, if you have STL available for use?
> STL has efficient memory pool implementation hidden
> from end user, and you have even write your own
> memory allocators for it.
Ok, ok, keep your pants on :) Bear in mind that I wrote the API changes some
5-6 months ago now and as I've said previously I'm still getting familiar with
STL so at the time was probably taking a more pragmatic C style approach to the
implementation. I'm happy to re-implement it within STL though, will take a